| Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:New dev blog: Starbase happy fun time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Wadaya wrote: Akita T wrote: blog wrote: We stuck with small numbers of blocks and no fuel use bonus on faction towers because dealing with small numbers of blocks makes starbases in general easier to use Why not just have it so that ev...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.11.08 08:28:00
|
2. Sticky:New dev blog: Starbase happy fun time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Callic Veratar wrote: Marcel Devereux wrote: Why not just convert the fuel that is currently in the fuel bay into fuel pellets? Convert a gas engine car to a diesel engine car as it's travelling down the highway. CCP is converting our ...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.11.08 06:42:00
|
3. Sticky:New dev blog: Starbase happy fun time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Do the transition so that fuel that is in bay is converted into blocks, the uneven part gets left behind as pi or ice products as they used to be. It's very simple for you to do. Would be crime against your customers for you not run the simple sc...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.11.07 18:07:00
|
4. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CynoNet Two wrote: [quote=Velin Dhal][quote=Tippia] was all about what would happen should a fleet with 250 supercaps invavde a system (this has happened before). The post went covered exactly how many sub-capitals it would take to beat their e...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.10.12 04:24:00
|
5. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Demon Azrakel wrote: [quote=Avon Diminishing returns on investment is how eve works, just because the ship costs 10x as much, it should not be 10x as good. ATM, sc cost 10x what a carrier costs, does 10x dps, has 20x the tank, and is ewar imm...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.10.12 04:19:00
|
6. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
DigitalCommunist wrote: First time posting on new forums; stopped halfway to take a rage poop. Didn't bother to copy my text like I usually do because new forums right? What can go wr--FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFFF...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.10.12 03:54:00
|
7. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Vile rat wrote: fwiw I hate supercaps more than just about anybody and even I can't think of a compelling reason that they can't dock. Seems like such a little thing to free up supercap pilots from boring endless hours of guarding a pos somewh...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.10.11 15:19:00
|
8. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Furb Killer wrote: Kahrnar wrote: [quote=Lord Zim] So do you fly everywhere you go with a support fleet? Give me a break No offense at all makes it useless Well finally one of the whiners understands it. Yes you are supposed to go everywh...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.10.11 14:24:00
|
9. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ramman K'arojic wrote: allow someway to permit CAPS and SUB-CAPS to interact. Wether it fighters on Carries only; where they can not easly shoot small fast ships but could kill a BS with a little effort. Count the capitals on both side,...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.10.11 09:46:00
|
10. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jada Maroo wrote: I don't fly caps nor do I really want to anytime soon, but one thing that irks me about the changes is the general lack of creativity. You have to remember you are talking about company that used atleast 1 year of active de...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.10.11 08:24:00
|
11. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Velin Dhal wrote: the real point here is that people are looking to exclude entire ship types from fleet fights just because one side can't or won't field Caps of their own. This.
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.10.11 08:06:00
|
12. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Psymn wrote: Guys, your super caps are no longer solo pwn-wagons. If my baddon gets tackled by a dram theres nothing i can do about it either. Thats why i bring people who can. I empathise with the folks complaining here that they will have to...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.10.11 07:16:00
|
13. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Velin Dhal wrote: Also, if you think the alliances that can field large amounts of super caps can't fight without them, you have to be exceedingly stupid. Please describe the reason to field supercapitals after this nerf? All combat in ...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.10.11 06:25:00
|
14. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Tallest wrote: Regarding Titan gun tracking: I am well aware of the issue and considered making changes to it. I decided against it for this balancing pass. We are still working on the winter release and this is not completely off the tabl...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2011.10.10 18:37:00
|
15. New Dev Blog: Puttin' on the foil coach - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Karuck Edited by: CCP Karuck on 21/03/2010 00:03:57 Originally by: Ix Forres Edited by: Ix Forres on 20/03/2010 14:12:26 What will CCP's policy be on automated scrap(remove space, silly filter) ers? Beca...
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2010.03.21 11:30:00
|
16. New Dev Blog: Sovereignty--Breaking the Chains - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I hope that the sovereignty controls will be held/managed by alliance and not by corporations of the alliance like in the old. Like pos gunning, strong managing was.
- by Ciryath Al'Darion - at 2009.09.09 13:35:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |